Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;stldanceartist, post: 551799, member: 13307&quot;]Hey everyone,</p><p><br /></p><p>Thanks for the replies!&nbsp; I&#039;ll post some whole coin shots later on today - I took a scan of the coins in question because the camera I&#039;ve been using doesn&#039;t really do quite so well with that sort of thing.&nbsp; The scans are good for an overall shot - but even at 9600 dpi won&#039;t give enough detail to look at the areas in question.</p><p><br /></p><p>I agree on the 1967 - I think it&#039;s strike doubling, although a really nice example of it nonetheless.&nbsp; However, I have to disagree on the 1941 DDO - the coin looks just like the photo in the Cherrypicker&#039;s.&nbsp; There is also doubling on the 1 in 1941, as stated in CPG (Cherrypicker&#039;s Guide) but I don&#039;t see (yet) any evidence on Liberty&#039;s nose.&nbsp; I&#039;ll post some more/better photos of that later on today.</p><p><br /></p><p>I used to make the mistake of thinking strike doubling was double die - until I searched through a box of quarters and found almost a complete roll of strike doubled coins.&nbsp; I thought to myself, &quot;Wait a minute....why would someone pay a premium for something this common?&quot; and then looked up the difference.</p><p><br /></p><p>The 1928S is the one I&#039;m up in the air about - there is definitely <i>something</i> there to the lower right of the S.&nbsp; I know the coin isn&#039;t in a high grade, so it may be difficult to diagnose an RPM.&nbsp; If anyone has a better photo of the CPG variety that would be great!</p><p><br /></p><p>Thanks, and I&#039;ll work on getting those photos tonight!</p><p><br /></p><p>~benjamin[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in