Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Speedy, post: 537700, member: 705&quot;]I have to wonder--did you not read what I posted?....</p><p>It really doesn&#039;t matter the &quot;size&quot;, but the style. Remember, they put the mintmarks on by hand back in 1928, and if the punch broke, or wore out, they would get a new one and keep right on going. Sometimes that meant a new style, and sometimes just alittle differeance in size,</p><p>Also take into account the wear on the die and its detail. You said that the one has a fatter middle--that could be a newer die, (or older) and as time went on and the die used more and more, the mintmark wore down to what looks to be a smaller MM.</p><p><br /></p><p>So far it looks like all of the photos you have posted have been of one type - </p><p><br /></p><p>Speedy[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in