Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;quarter-back, post: 1695649, member: 47022&quot;]I&#039;ll buy that, especially as it nicely explains the flattened reverse.&nbsp; It goes to show how much there is to learn.&nbsp; Two questions, though. First, how does your method account for the apparent die clash, and second, why does the fainter image have be the second strike?&nbsp; I would think the more recent strike would be stronger since it flattens the previous raised elements.&nbsp; This should be especially true for elements such the &quot;WE TRU&quot; where the fainter image extends beyond the rim but the letters do not show as dents in the rim.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in