Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
1925 SLQ: Opinions?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 561221, member: 15309"]How in the world did I miss this thread. I agree completely that strike variations are pronounced from date to date for this series. It is entirely possible to have a full head coin with extreme strike weakness in other areas of the design. It is also very possible to have a razor sharp struck SLQ without FH.</p><p><br /></p><p>I also look at Liberty's right leg for wear, because that it is where it shows first. I don't see any wear on the OP's coin. However, I will admit that the toning along with the photo could be hiding the wear. I am more inclined to think this is an uncirculated coin with a real nice head and sorry for being blunt, ugly toning.</p><p><br /></p><p>And Bill has seen FH 30's with incomplete shields. Well now everyone can say they have seen one. Here is an obverse photo of my SLQ 1930-S NGC MS67 FH. Take a look at that shield.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o59/ACPitBoss/Standing%20Liberty%20Quarters/SLQ1930-SNGCMS67FHObverse3.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Sparrow, I need to ask you a question. You are the first collector that I have ever seen that likes toning that results in muted luster. What is it about muted luster that appeals to you? </p><p><br /></p><p>I know that each collector has his own opinion about which elements of grading are more important. Personally, I rank them in this order: Eye Appeal, Luster, Surface Preservation, and strike. Eye appeal is the result of the culmination of the other 3 elements in combination with toning. However, the most important (IMO) element with regard to eye appeal is toning. I have seen really pretty coins in the lower MS grades due to surface marks, and have seen many gorgeous coins with below average strikes, but I have never seen an eye appealing uncirculated coin with muted luster.</p><p><br /></p><p>Please know that I am not criticizing your collecting preferences. Rather I am fascinated about your approach and would like to further understand it.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 561221, member: 15309"]How in the world did I miss this thread. I agree completely that strike variations are pronounced from date to date for this series. It is entirely possible to have a full head coin with extreme strike weakness in other areas of the design. It is also very possible to have a razor sharp struck SLQ without FH. I also look at Liberty's right leg for wear, because that it is where it shows first. I don't see any wear on the OP's coin. However, I will admit that the toning along with the photo could be hiding the wear. I am more inclined to think this is an uncirculated coin with a real nice head and sorry for being blunt, ugly toning. And Bill has seen FH 30's with incomplete shields. Well now everyone can say they have seen one. Here is an obverse photo of my SLQ 1930-S NGC MS67 FH. Take a look at that shield. [IMG]http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o59/ACPitBoss/Standing%20Liberty%20Quarters/SLQ1930-SNGCMS67FHObverse3.jpg[/IMG] Sparrow, I need to ask you a question. You are the first collector that I have ever seen that likes toning that results in muted luster. What is it about muted luster that appeals to you? I know that each collector has his own opinion about which elements of grading are more important. Personally, I rank them in this order: Eye Appeal, Luster, Surface Preservation, and strike. Eye appeal is the result of the culmination of the other 3 elements in combination with toning. However, the most important (IMO) element with regard to eye appeal is toning. I have seen really pretty coins in the lower MS grades due to surface marks, and have seen many gorgeous coins with below average strikes, but I have never seen an eye appealing uncirculated coin with muted luster. Please know that I am not criticizing your collecting preferences. Rather I am fascinated about your approach and would like to further understand it.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
1925 SLQ: Opinions?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...