Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Beefer518, post: 2879062, member: 87737&quot;]Both of these are graded by NGC, and both are a 63. I did a side by side zoomed comparison with Lightroom, and from what I can tell, both have the same level of detail. </p><p><br /></p><p>The coin on the left, IMO, lacks great eye appeal, but has very clean surfaces. The coin on the right, again in my opinion, has great eye appeal, but looks to have hairlines in the left field. I&#039;m trying to figure out if the eye appeal of the right coin outweighs the hairlines, or are they too obvious/distracting? The left coin&#039;s toning is not very attractive, and looks like it&#039;s a dirty coin, so could the inverse be true of this one, where the clean surfaces made up for the lack of eye appeal?</p><p><br /></p><p>These pics are off of NGC&#039;s site, and are not the seller&#039;s pics. In the coin on the right, the seller&#039;s pics do not show the hairlines. That makes me wonder a bit if maybe they were on the slab, and the seller polished them off? I do have that question in to the seller, and I&#039;m waiting for a response.</p><p><br /></p><p>Reverse sides so no concerns on either coin, and look the same as their respective obverses.</p><p><br /></p><p>Cost difference is negligible, so that is not a factor. </p><p><br /></p><p>Thanks!</p><p>[ATTACH=full]689558[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in