1924 D Lincoln Penny VF with die break

I created that username when I much younger, It just so happens to be, two of my favorite features on myself.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

The 24-d has always been desirable, but even more desirable when it is in a state of good preservation. So while error collectors might attach a premium to it, your regualar lincoln collector is more apt to downgrade the coin.

 

The mintage figures on the 1924D was a little over 2.5 million were as the 1924 was over 75 million, because of the smaller mintage makes it desirable.

 

were you able to see the pictures? is that something basically from wear and tear?

 

No, it was asking for your password.

 

Yeah, that looks like post mint damage. Wear and tear.

 

i thought so, but since im really not familiar with all the errors i knew it wouldnt hurt to ask!

 

Yep, that's what I do.

 

Actually, if the die break were a cud, the oppositr side of the coin would be effected and would show up as a weakness of strike on the opposite side of the coin corresponding to the CUD. Hopefully there will be a picture soon.

Thanks,
Bill

 

Am I mising something? I diodnt see a D in the picture.

 

That's another coin, not the OP's coin.

 

There are several cud collectors on ebay. I've sold some common date coins with cuds for $12 and up. I would guess the ebay value of the 24 d with cud at $30-$35.

 

Thanks, I saw the 24 D and it is a CUD as it has been determined. The statement i made about the weak spot on the reverse is valid. It is exactly what you look for to determine that the coin is a CUD. Those who collect them would definitely pay a premium for a CUD error on a lower mintage coin.

Have Fun,
Bill

 

I can't see the photos without a password.

 

The 1924D that was first discussed in this thread is indeed a CUD, and would have tobe quite scarce at that. Anyone who is trying to build a die set of all Lincoln cent CUDs would pay substantial money for that coin. Well over the $10 premium previously mentioned. This is a scarcer date, and a scarce error on a scarcer date...it's not just any typical CUD.