Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;desertgem, post: 431368, member: 15199&quot;]Johnny, the more I consider your coin, the more I think I need to modify my first answer to the extent that the mintmark is visible but weak, but it doesn&#039;t seem to fit any of the recognized varieties. Without actually having it actually in hand, I now lean towards a regular 1922-D die that was somewhat filled during the use process, or a coin that was tooled down to imitate a 22 Plain. Do you see anything of interest on the fields near the mm? Many of the 22s were worked as the price difference was so great.</p><p><br /></p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Rlm has handled more of these than I have and I will yield to his input.&nbsp; It is very interesting to have 22s on your watch program to read the ebay descriptions as they pop up. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>The coppercoins site says of the 22 plain &quot;<font face="verdana">[SIZE=-1]<span style="color: Red">In truth, all of them are typical and rather common errors, and none of them should logically command any premium value...but since they do, we deal with reality.</span>[/SIZE]</font>&quot;</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Jim[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in