1922 No "D" -- Real "No D" or Weak "D"?

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Histman, Jul 27, 2017.

  1. Histman

    Histman Too Many Coins, Not Enough Time!

    Hey Guys! Thoughts on this 1922? Listed as "No D".

    1922 No D.jpg 1922 No D #2.jpg 1922- No D Reverse.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    Looks like a no D strong reverse to me. 2nd 2 is stronger. LIBERTY gets weaker to stronger left to right...
     
  4. Beefer518

    Beefer518 Well-Known Member

    I'm going weak D, weak reverse.

    The biggest thing that is suspect to me is there is something going on with the field where the D would be in the first image. Possible removed/altered, or the photo just isn't good enough to show what's actually there.


    As for diagnostics:

    OBVERSE:

    TRUST is mushy
    First T in TRUST is smaller then RUST
    WE is mushy
    Second 2 does not look like a die pair #2 (the tail of the 2 is missing the flair/lift)

    REVERSE:

    Right side wheat stalk steam is way too soft to be a strong reverse (on strong rev, those should be sharp)
    E and P are also too mushy
    Lines at the top of the stalks are blended more than (IMO) what the rest of the coin shows for wear


    I'm stuck with which pair it is, either die pair 1 or 3. I'm leaning towards 3, but the small T and the WE have me also considering 1.
     
    furham likes this.
  5. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor

    I think there is enough doubt in the area of the mintmark, I would call it a worn normal 22-D rather than a 22 No-D strong rev. ( #2).
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page