Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;rzage, post: 1157376, member: 14070&quot;]You maybe right , that&#039;s the trouble with grading from pics , they could be photographed to hide defects , after looking at the coin again I wouldn&#039;t go higher than&nbsp; 62 or maybe a 63 . Type 1 SLQs often have grainy surfaces and 63 and lower could have nice luster or subdued luster . That&#039;s what I was trying to say to the op that grading from pics is no way to be sure how the coin looks in hand . Which at first I thought he had the coin in hand .</p><p>Rusty[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in