Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;iPen, post: 3032058, member: 69760&quot;]Interesting, I wonder if the Director of the Mint was referring to proofs for 1916 only. If so, then that may explain why the 1917 figures show that there were fewer (939) proofs struck.</p><p><br /></p><p>What&#039;s important to note is that March of 1917 saw a new Director of the Mint coming into office. Maybe the staff secretly signed off on minting proof coins during that transition lol[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in