Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
1916 Buffalo Nickel grading test.....
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Paul M., post: 4281574, member: 73165"]I chose coin A as the higher grade, but I prefer coin B, because, as [USER=19250]@Paddy54[/USER] said, I buy with my eyes. Even in the old slab, I find it hard to believe anyone thought that coin A was an MS-61. Had you shown me an ANA slab, I might have believed it, but I think somebody got robbed at MS-61, and I bet [USER=19250]@Paddy54[/USER] got a good deal because of that number. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>I agree that grading is a bit subjective; experienced people can easily differ +- 1 in MS grades, and, often the choice between two grades in the circulated grades is debatable. But, what you've shown here isn't that. You've got a coin that was undergraded years ago, IMO, and undergraded to a tougher prevailing standard. I would have not been surprised to see that coin at MS-62 or MS-63 in the ANACS slab. A better way to show how grading is subjective would be to get two coins of the same date, graded by the same company, in the same slab generation side by side. I kind of doubt you could find a pair like that that are 5 grades apart!</p><p><br /></p><p>Either way, I don't blame you for buying and liking both.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Paul M., post: 4281574, member: 73165"]I chose coin A as the higher grade, but I prefer coin B, because, as [USER=19250]@Paddy54[/USER] said, I buy with my eyes. Even in the old slab, I find it hard to believe anyone thought that coin A was an MS-61. Had you shown me an ANA slab, I might have believed it, but I think somebody got robbed at MS-61, and I bet [USER=19250]@Paddy54[/USER] got a good deal because of that number. ;) I agree that grading is a bit subjective; experienced people can easily differ +- 1 in MS grades, and, often the choice between two grades in the circulated grades is debatable. But, what you've shown here isn't that. You've got a coin that was undergraded years ago, IMO, and undergraded to a tougher prevailing standard. I would have not been surprised to see that coin at MS-62 or MS-63 in the ANACS slab. A better way to show how grading is subjective would be to get two coins of the same date, graded by the same company, in the same slab generation side by side. I kind of doubt you could find a pair like that that are 5 grades apart! Either way, I don't blame you for buying and liking both.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
1916 Buffalo Nickel grading test.....
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...