Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Sholom, post: 553835, member: 17753&quot;]Hey -- have you been reading my mind? <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>On wheaties (correct me if I&#039;m wrong) I tend to look at both: cheek/jaw separation; and lines in the wheat heads -- and kind of average the two.</p><p><br /></p><p>Does that make sense (cents)?</p><p><br /></p><p>If so, the classical definition (as far as this semi-newbie knows) of wheaties are:</p><p><br /></p><p>VG: half the wheat lines show</p><p>F: wheat lines worn but mostly (almost all? or all?) visible.</p><p>VF: cheek and jaw separation, no worn spots on wheat heads.</p><p><br /></p><p>So, (wrt to the 1913 that started this thread) it seems to me that the front <b>might </b>be VF or maybe higher, but (at least over the internet, with my poor eyes) the back seem to me to be VG or lower.</p><p><br /></p><p>So, with my limited knowlege, if I were grading it for myself to decide how much to pay, I&#039;d be thinking F at best.</p><p><br /></p><p>OK, experts . . . . how&#039;s that analysis (from someone who&#039;s desperate to learn how to do this better?)</p><p><br /></p><p>(I&#039;ve left the &quot;cleaning&quot; part out of this, b/c I don&#039;t know enough to recognize it here)[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in