Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;EyeEatWheaties, post: 997247, member: 26972&quot;]Well,&nbsp; everyone seems to be consistent with grading it AU.&nbsp;&nbsp; I don&#039;t think I can shoot the high points to show that there is no or very little wear.&nbsp; I believe MS62/3 details </p><p><br /></p><p>This is a comparison to an AU55 from the PCGS coinfacts website.&nbsp; I think this show better on why I was saying a soft strike.</p><p><br /></p><p>Funny/no hilarious!!! how it appears that PCGS oiled the coin for the photo. talk about intentional toning doctoring.&nbsp; sheesh&nbsp; .. Oh its ok if they do it.&nbsp; I forgot.&nbsp; <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z242/papasteeze/Coins/1912-SObversehighpointscropped-1.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z242/papasteeze/Coins/1912-SPCGSAU55Highpointscropped.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in