Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;jtlee321, post: 2524173, member: 73983&quot;]It is.&nbsp; The 1215 version of the reverse file is 105MB and the 608 version is 20MB just just a bit over 1/5th the size for a 1/4th reduction in overall resolution.&nbsp; Now the 1215 version of the obverse file is only 70MB and the 608 version is 21, why the discrepancy, I don&#039;t know.&nbsp; One would think that the Obverse file should be smaller as it&#039;s 16 frames less than the reverse.&nbsp; The Master 1215 obverse is smaller than the 1215 reverse, but why by 35MB is a mystery to me.&nbsp; Then once reduced, the 608 Obverse is 1MB larger than the reverse.&nbsp; Obviously there is some compression algorithm at work here.&nbsp; I just wish it was a number slider based one like that used in JPEG.&nbsp; I know varying the dithering percentage would help, but I just don&#039;t know that much about GIF&#039;s.&nbsp; This is where further study will help me.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in