Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
1905 V Nickel ?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="HandsomeToad, post: 432314, member: 12965"]Once more, which was my original argument/statement, look at the four holes that are in a square shape, ONLY THE FOUR HOLES. In reference to obverse to reverse, do they not look identical as a group? Forget what you call the fifth hole, just look at the four that are CLEARLY in a GROUP and compare them? Look at distance from one hole to another hole, then compare them to the holes on the other side.</p><p> </p><p>As to angles, DUH! I said 90 degrees was an apporximate angle, not an EXACT! I also told you to use your imagination to line them up, which that, inofitself, says the angle is not an exact 90 degrees, plus, the photographer has the reverse already slightly tilted counterclockwise in the original pic, so that throws things off in the first place.</p><p> </p><p>As to mirror effect, to get it right, if the holes are opposite of one another, all one would have to do is line the holes up and then the mirror effect will be correct. To do that requires adjusting the pic to small degrees less than 90 degrees, which is all I did to the pic, plus flipping it to have the mirror effect occur. So, if the holes were exactly opposite each other, my reference pics were close to how rotated the reverse would have been.</p><p> </p><p>As to distance, I already covered that earlier in my postscript so I already noticed the holes weren't the same distance from the edge, but the original pics were not the same size and I couldn't measure to tell. When I redid the pics, I made them the same size so the reference would be closer to true and I didn't think about measuring, once I had them closer to the same size, until after I posted them. So like I said, this is all probably mute, since the distance isn't right but it could still be the case if the machine used to make these holes offset the holes to the point they'd be to the side of the other holes (scissor effect), but I doubt that.</p><p> </p><p>Ribbit <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p> </p><p>Ps: Do you think one tool made all four holes (the ones that make a square) in one punch or four seperate punches? Anotherwords, was the square formed by the tool or the person making the holes?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="HandsomeToad, post: 432314, member: 12965"]Once more, which was my original argument/statement, look at the four holes that are in a square shape, ONLY THE FOUR HOLES. In reference to obverse to reverse, do they not look identical as a group? Forget what you call the fifth hole, just look at the four that are CLEARLY in a GROUP and compare them? Look at distance from one hole to another hole, then compare them to the holes on the other side. As to angles, DUH! I said 90 degrees was an apporximate angle, not an EXACT! I also told you to use your imagination to line them up, which that, inofitself, says the angle is not an exact 90 degrees, plus, the photographer has the reverse already slightly tilted counterclockwise in the original pic, so that throws things off in the first place. As to mirror effect, to get it right, if the holes are opposite of one another, all one would have to do is line the holes up and then the mirror effect will be correct. To do that requires adjusting the pic to small degrees less than 90 degrees, which is all I did to the pic, plus flipping it to have the mirror effect occur. So, if the holes were exactly opposite each other, my reference pics were close to how rotated the reverse would have been. As to distance, I already covered that earlier in my postscript so I already noticed the holes weren't the same distance from the edge, but the original pics were not the same size and I couldn't measure to tell. When I redid the pics, I made them the same size so the reference would be closer to true and I didn't think about measuring, once I had them closer to the same size, until after I posted them. So like I said, this is all probably mute, since the distance isn't right but it could still be the case if the machine used to make these holes offset the holes to the point they'd be to the side of the other holes (scissor effect), but I doubt that. Ribbit :) Ps: Do you think one tool made all four holes (the ones that make a square) in one punch or four seperate punches? Anotherwords, was the square formed by the tool or the person making the holes?[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
1905 V Nickel ?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...