Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;skaskankerbr, post: 842278, member: 23211&quot;]it is not a hit that is an untoned spot from where the holder on the pendant of the necklace was.&nbsp; it also has some white powder in the rim there that makes it really look like a hit, but i assure you with some canned air spray on that area i could clear it right up.</p><p><br /></p><p>The area i am looking at being cleaned is the obverse around the head of course. The rest is 100% legit(imo) but that is why i am asking the pros. I can be assured that because of the fact that the necklace left parts of the coins untoned and sealed. the rim of the coin is partially untoned. if the coin was cooked the necklace would have been effected as well. It simply wouldn&#039;t have been done that way. </p><p>I do realize that however being in the necklace reduced its value because it left parts untoned.</p><p>Au50 is pretty fair that&#039;s what i was thinking around when i bought it aswell.</p><p><br /></p><p>your price i also have problems with red book value is 50$ for au 50.</p><p><br /></p><p>would it help to get a photo of where the coin sat? in the same aspect of artificial toning i guess it could have been done inside the necklace if the jewelry was covered. i was wondering this because the what i assume is a 999 hallmark on. My caution is because the coin clearly toned in the necklace from the shiny holder marks. BUT the jewelry part of it is not even close to as toned as the coin. Is this common? i don&#039;t know if coin silver tones differently then 999.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in