Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Morgandude11, post: 1453652, member: 37839&quot;][ATTACH]180455.vB[/ATTACH][ATTACH]180456.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Here is one of my two 1899 Morgans for comparison.&nbsp; No guessing--this is a 63.&nbsp; This one has background hits, but not that much on the cheek.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Yes, I know that.&nbsp; The border just doesn&#039;t look like the older NGC holder to me.&nbsp; I could definitely be wrong, as more of my coins are PCGS than NGC, but it looks like a paper background.&nbsp; Still say it is a&nbsp; 62.or low end 63 at best.&nbsp; Stand by my 61-62, with an outside shot at 63.&nbsp; Doesn&#039;t matter, unless one gets into the higher range with that date--then it gets very pricey and scarce.&nbsp; I have two 1899 coins, as that is an underpriced date due to the mintage.&nbsp; While rumors persist that the survival rate is higher than people think, I tend to anticipate that one as a big appreciation in the future--for many years, collectors have speculated on it, and whether or not gobs of them were hidden away. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in