1897 Indian Head Double Strike 30% Offcenter

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Eric the Red, Apr 22, 2021.

  1. Eric the Red

    Eric the Red Supporter! Supporter

    Hello Everyone I recently added this coin to my collection. It looks legitimate, but as always I like to get second opinions. Below is the description that was given by the vendor.

    1897 Indian Head is AU and 30% double-struck upon ejection from the hub. Very rare and one-of-a-kind unique Mint error coin. These are usually difficult to find, especially in such good shape. The edge damage and reverse damage is a direct result of the coin being hammered by the hub/die. A lot of times these will be completely be clipped off in the process.

    So whats the verdict? Authentic?

    Thanks in advance for all comments.
    Cheers 20210422_214308.jpg 20210422_214326.jpg 20210422_214429.jpg 20210422_214537.jpg 20210422_214615.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Eric the Red

    Eric the Red Supporter! Supporter

  4. Eric the Red

    Eric the Red Supporter! Supporter

  5. potty dollar 1878

    potty dollar 1878 Well-Known Member

    Looks like damage to me.
     
    SensibleSal66 likes this.
  6. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    With it’s 30% second strike I should be seeing some of the strike. All I see is a ring from what is being called the rim of the second strike. I can see no signs of the coins design from the second strike.

    I’m not an expert by any means but I would be questioning this coin. I’m not convinced that this is a second strike on the coin.
     
    paddyman98 and Matthew Kruse like this.
  7. Matthew Kruse

    Matthew Kruse Young Numismatist

    I agree with @Collecting Nut on this one. I see the rim but not really any of the design. @paddyman98 could probably give you a good opinion.
     
  8. affordablecc

    affordablecc New Member

    Hello,
    Unfortunately this is not a double strike. If it were it would have the design from the second strike. I hope you didn’t pay to much for it and if you bought from a dealer see if they will take it back. Sincerely, Noal
     
    Matthew Kruse likes this.
  9. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Eclectic & avid numismatist Moderator

    Interesting. I'm undecided on whether that's a vise job or a legit double strike. Out of my depth there.
     
  10. coloradobryan

    coloradobryan Well-Known Member

    Im with the other posters. Not an error. Does not show any design from a second strike.
     
  11. paddyman98

    paddyman98 Let me burst your bubble! Supporter

    Not a double strike.
    DEFDAM - Definitely Damaged
     
  12. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 Casual Collector / error expert "in Training "

    Wow, very interesting ! I'm calling on a the Specialists ( Edwin)or Expert ( Fred Weinburg) for this one . :nailbiting:
     
  13. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    Considering that the reverse shows no sign of the design, I doubt the authenticity
     
  14. mikediamond

    mikediamond Coin Collector

    Definitely a "squeeze job" (vise job, hammer job, garage job, smash job, etc.).
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page