1896 Oh S$1

I'm going to do a social experiment, and see how worthy your grading standards are.. So whose effective, and not.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

I grade it as " Blurry " ...

 

Braydon, why don't you tell us what you grade it, according to your grading standards? I pick that, I agree with it 100%. How's that for social skills?

 

Looks VF with rim damage.

And blurry.

 

It's not a good idea to start a post by telling a bunch of people you're going to see how "worthy" they are in your eyes. After all, who are you to judge our worthiness? I admit that today has put me in quite a foul mood, but your post is poor form. Try editing your post and putting something a little less condescending in there if you actually want people to answer your question on its grade.

 

Sorry, your pics don't allow us to determine wear from weakness of strike, and 96-O is notoriously weakly struck with poor luster. Even with good photos, this would be incredibly hard to grade.

 

Not gradeable damaged,

 

ditto, and I am not grumpy.

at least not right now

 

I don't get it either. How worthy are you? Your basing judging others using a damaged coin. Anyhow I am at F/VF details, VF-20 details--damaged.

 

I have no desire to be 'worthy' in your eyes.

 

Based on their other posts, the OP would likely grade it MS and attribute it with a rare VAM.....

 

Based on their other posts, the OP would likely grade it MS and attribute it with a rare VAM.....


+1