Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;messydesk, post: 2908552, member: 1765&quot;]I haven&#039;t seen one of these in high grade.&nbsp; Usually, the contemporary counterfeits are seen in lower grades.&nbsp; Referring to the article, the existence of a coin with PL attributes -- I assume this doesn&#039;t mean a fully PL coin, as those are super rare for 96-O -- would put me on the side of genuine.&nbsp; None of the dies of the contemporary counterfeit Micro-O family coins had enough detail on the copy to start out PL.&nbsp; Of course, seeing is believing, so I&#039;d have to closely examine a semi-PL coin.&nbsp; The rings in the field do show up on other genuine Morgans once in a great while.&nbsp; 81 VAM 17A and 85 VAM 9E both have these, but on the portrait.&nbsp; I assume they are water droplets that got in the way of the hubbing process.</p><p><br /></p><p>As for what to do with the coin, that depends on if you want it, I guess.&nbsp; If you don&#039;t, you should be able to find someone to pay you at least what you paid, probably a touch more.&nbsp; I noticed ANACS didn&#039;t say cleaned, but probably no need if they first said not genuine.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in