Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
1895 Morgan Proof Question (NGC Registry)
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Mark Feld, post: 674637, member: 11467"]Doug, of the four scenarios you mentioned above, the first and last say the same thing - that no business strikes were ever produced and all we have is Proofs. So that leaves us with three possibilities, rather than four.</p><p><br /></p><p>And the second one (no Proofs were made, but that we have 12,880 business strikes out there which are very Proof Like) doesn't begin to fly, based on the appearance of the coins. They are every bit as Proof as any other date in the series and they don't look like deeply mirrored PL pieces, which would have a different surface texture, less impressive strikes and exhibit abrasions/bag-marks/contact marks, as opposed to hairlines that Proofs typically acquire. And, I have seen original 1895 Proof sets that have been intact since the time of issue. I will also add that Proofs tend to tone very differently from business strikes, and I have seen numerous toned Proofs that looked nothing like toned business strikes.</p><p><br /></p><p>All of the above aside and whatever the possibilities, there are no known business strikes, only Proofs. And personally, I don't believe they should be included in a business strike set.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Mark Feld, post: 674637, member: 11467"]Doug, of the four scenarios you mentioned above, the first and last say the same thing - that no business strikes were ever produced and all we have is Proofs. So that leaves us with three possibilities, rather than four. And the second one (no Proofs were made, but that we have 12,880 business strikes out there which are very Proof Like) doesn't begin to fly, based on the appearance of the coins. They are every bit as Proof as any other date in the series and they don't look like deeply mirrored PL pieces, which would have a different surface texture, less impressive strikes and exhibit abrasions/bag-marks/contact marks, as opposed to hairlines that Proofs typically acquire. And, I have seen original 1895 Proof sets that have been intact since the time of issue. I will also add that Proofs tend to tone very differently from business strikes, and I have seen numerous toned Proofs that looked nothing like toned business strikes. All of the above aside and whatever the possibilities, there are no known business strikes, only Proofs. And personally, I don't believe they should be included in a business strike set.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
1895 Morgan Proof Question (NGC Registry)
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...