1895 Morgan Proof Question (NGC Registry)

I'm not even going to look it up before replying - you are guessing correctly.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

Proofs is Proofs and Business strikes are business strikes and never the twain will meet , or whatever the saying is , no Proofs shouldn't be included .
rzage

 

I agree with the majority here, NO. No one has asked should any other Proofs be included in the set, so I will. Why should the '95 be included but no other Proofs be. Talk about unfair, How about the other 25 or 30 MOrgan Proofs. I don't know how many there are without researching it, but if NGC wants to include one Proof, why not include them all.
Just My Opinion,
John

 

Actually if you look at my post I recomended NGC create another set that includes all business strikes + all proofs.

It was post#12

 

If NGC is going to include the 1895 Proof, it is because there are no known business strikes for that date. The same can't be said for other Proof dates. That's 'why the others wouldn't be included.

 

Thanks for that info Mark, I was unaware of that fact.