Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;BooksB4Coins, post: 2540777, member: 36230&quot;]One obverse and two reverse dies were used. Earlier in this thread Hommer first brought up the date placement, which is wrong on your &quot;example&quot;, so let&#039;s think about this one... If only one obv die was used, and it does not match yours, what does this suggest to you? In addition, I&#039;ve already pointed out to you that the mintmark on your example doesn&#039;t match as well. Two rev dies were used with two different placements, so if yours doesn&#039;t match either, what does this tell you? If it quacks like a duck, waddles like a duck, and looks like a duck, is it wise to conclude its actually a swan because that&#039;s what you want it to be?</p><p><br /></p><p>I do believe we&#039;ve been through this before with a supposed 76-CC 20C you refused to believe was fake even though your example didn&#039;t display the strong obv doubling the handful of known genuine examples do. I don&#039;t know where you&#039;re acquiring such coins, but if you&#039;re truly spending anywhere near what you&#039;ve claimed to on this one, you really need to stop, think, and learn before you&#039;re parted with any more of your money.</p><p><br /></p><p>If this story is true, you really need to invest your efforts into hopefully getting your money back instead of dismissing the facts presented to you, or insisting it real simply because that&#039;s what you want to believe. Good luck.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in