Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;CamaroDMD, post: 609763, member: 5233&quot;]I don&#039;t think you can access the strike fully with these photos.&nbsp; The lighting creates an illusion that the luster has been worn off the high points when it may not have been.&nbsp; It very well may be circulated...but I won&#039;t be a but surprised to see it grade MS.&nbsp; If it grades MS, because the coin is free of bag marks it should be in the mid-60s.&nbsp; PCGS doesn&#039;t tend to worry about strike too much if the coin has nice eye appeal.&nbsp; This coin appears to have nice luster and is mark free.&nbsp; If this is a poor strike, which I believe it is, this coin will be a MS64 minimum IMHO.</p><p><br /></p><p>Like I said before, 1892-CC are typically a nicely struck year but there are quite a few examples of poorly struck coins.&nbsp; So, this could very easily be one of those.&nbsp; If that is the case, I would pass on this coin because a nice strike can be easily located.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in