Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
1892-S Morgan mint mark?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Insider, post: 2333046, member: 24314"]Excellent point <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie26" alt=":bookworm:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />...the opposite side of a counter stamped, chopped, or SEVERELY damaged coin will often show this effect (smushed out design or field *). However, in the case of minor, "micro damage" that will not be the case. If the "smush" was on anything BESIDES the "S" on this coin, no one would care or even see it. Also, as you point out, the "damage" on the "O" is not significant. In fact, no one should consider it other than normal wear and tear. Furthermore, I'll bet my posting privilege on CT <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie81" alt=":shifty:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />: <span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 0)">but only for the rest of the day <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie84" alt=":smug:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> </span>) that the other side of the OP's coin is normal!</p><p><br /></p><p>Problem I often see (REMEMBER - all posts are MY OPINION) on CT is everything gets exaggerated. Posters wish to call "everything" cleaned or PMD. Coins get wear and tear as they circulate... the more circulation they receive, the less SOME hairlines, cuts, scratches, rim hits, damage matters.</p><p><br /></p><p>*I've posted micrographs of both sides of a very small "punch mark" that flattened the reverse very little.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Insider, post: 2333046, member: 24314"]Excellent point :bookworm:...the opposite side of a counter stamped, chopped, or SEVERELY damaged coin will often show this effect (smushed out design or field *). However, in the case of minor, "micro damage" that will not be the case. If the "smush" was on anything BESIDES the "S" on this coin, no one would care or even see it. Also, as you point out, the "damage" on the "O" is not significant. In fact, no one should consider it other than normal wear and tear. Furthermore, I'll bet my posting privilege on CT :):shifty:: [COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 0)]but only for the rest of the day :smug: [/COLOR]) that the other side of the OP's coin is normal! Problem I often see (REMEMBER - all posts are MY OPINION) on CT is everything gets exaggerated. Posters wish to call "everything" cleaned or PMD. Coins get wear and tear as they circulate... the more circulation they receive, the less SOME hairlines, cuts, scratches, rim hits, damage matters. *I've posted micrographs of both sides of a very small "punch mark" that flattened the reverse very little.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
1892-S Morgan mint mark?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...