Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;CamaroDMD, post: 605086, member: 5233&quot;]I don&#039;t think this coin is any better than a VF30 details.&nbsp; I agree that is has been harshly cleaned as well.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>You can&#039;t assume that O mint coins are always poorly struck.&nbsp; Sure, many of them are...but there are several years that are typically found well struck.&nbsp; But, 1892-O is not one of them (probably the worst struck coin in the series).&nbsp; <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>However, 1892-CC was a pretty well struck date.&nbsp; However...being a CC coin doesn&#039;t necessarily mean well struck either.&nbsp; An example is 1880.&nbsp; The 1880-CC was a coin with a wide range of strike quality...there were some well struck examples and some very poor one&#039;s.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in