1890-S Double Eagle Gold - back from crossgrading

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by razorblaydesjr, Sep 21, 2015.

  1. H8_modern

    H8_modern Attracted to small round-ish art

    I think your coin suffered from a snob attack. There was no way PCGS was going to grade a coin higher than SEGS. You'd have been better off sending it raw. which is kind of pathetic
     
    jwitten and razorblaydesjr like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. razorblaydesjr

    razorblaydesjr Active Member

    Yep... really pathetic
     
  4. Dancing Fire

    Dancing Fire Junior Member

    Crack it out now and re-submit.
     
  5. Owle

    Owle Junior Member

    Just don't send it in under express at over $50 a pop plus shipping, what did that one cost you $100 including shipping to and from? The grading services are laughing all the way to the bank. Do a gold rush at NGC piggy back it on someone elses submission if you do resubmit.
     
    razorblaydesjr likes this.
  6. razorblaydesjr

    razorblaydesjr Active Member

    Yes, I agree @Owle. If I resubmitted the coin then it would be in a couple/few months when I had some other coins to send in as well. I sent this gold under their standard tier with a secure holder option, but it was sent in with 40 other coins. So the shipping/ins there was spread out over all of them. I'm guessing my total cost for this one coin was about $60-$65 dollars.

    The decision that I'm torn between is, sending it back to PCGS or sending it to NGC for crossing to and upgrade. I have memberships at both, so it really just comes down to what I believe is the better option. I don't think I've decided that yet.
     
  7. mill rat41

    mill rat41 Member

    I guessed 62 in your old thread. IMO, PCGS saw this coin as a super duper slider and thought it was too nice for a 58 grade. So, they slapped a 62 on it. I consider gold in 62 slabs to be a bit of a "trap" - they are either 58s or true uncs with lots of chatter or hairlines. I have a great looking $10 Indian in a 62 slab. Mine in the strictest sense should have graded 58, but with original color and almost no marks they bumped it to 62.
     
    JPeace$ likes this.
  8. Tater

    Tater Coin Collector

    I like the idea of crossing it with NGC.
     
    jwitten and razorblaydesjr like this.
  9. kaosleeroy108

    kaosleeroy108 The Mahayana Tea Shop & hobby center

    Always wanted one I just can't afford it but one day I will
     
  10. kaosleeroy108

    kaosleeroy108 The Mahayana Tea Shop & hobby center

    I'm sure if you resubmit you'll get a better grade with a work up of the coin
     
  11. David Setree Rare Coins

    David Setree Rare Coins Well-Known Member

    Lack of luster is very hard to decide from a photo.
     
    JPeace$ likes this.
  12. johnrpva

    johnrpva Active Member

    based on pictures 4 and 5, crack it and send it to NGC...if those are 64s, yours should come back 66...only based on that comparison (especially picture 4)

    Straight up, I think the 62 was punishment for submitting a SEGs coin
     
    micbraun and razorblaydesjr like this.
  13. Owle

    Owle Junior Member

    You could try the PCGS "reconsideration" service which will set you back a grading fee and shipping and if successful, 62+ or 63, etc. you will be hit with a 1% additional charge.

    I would either do a show service as a crack out or send it to NGC raw with other coins on a gold rush. I sent in a group of coins for a friend and he got some good grades and no grades. Others set up a submission as an "argument" so that the graders see a bunch of low end 62s, then your better date coin that stands out as a grade more and you get your #.
     
    razorblaydesjr and micbraun like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page