Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
CoinTalk
>
What's it Worth
>
1890 morgan... ??? 63?? bu??? au??
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 204233, member: 112"]I understand your question about weak strike and the reasoning. But there is a way to tell weak strike from wear. On the obverse, look at the hair around the ear and the area I have circled. See how the earlobe and the hair directly above it is a different color than the central portion of the ear and the hair near the top of the red ine. That is because of wear. With minor wear the luster is worn off and that is what cause those areas to be a different color than the adjoining areas. The same is true with the bun, the cheek, the neck and the fields under the chin. The luster is worn off. The same applies to areas on the reverse I have circled.</p><p><br /></p><p>Yes it is true that the hair above the ear will often be flat if the coin is weakly struck. But with weakly struck coins that hair above the ear, while flat, will be the very same color as the rest of the hair and it will have luster. When it does not have luster and is flat and a different color, the cause is wear - not a weak strike. </p><p><br /></p><p>That's the reason for my opinion.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>edit - sorry, forgot to attach the pics[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 204233, member: 112"]I understand your question about weak strike and the reasoning. But there is a way to tell weak strike from wear. On the obverse, look at the hair around the ear and the area I have circled. See how the earlobe and the hair directly above it is a different color than the central portion of the ear and the hair near the top of the red ine. That is because of wear. With minor wear the luster is worn off and that is what cause those areas to be a different color than the adjoining areas. The same is true with the bun, the cheek, the neck and the fields under the chin. The luster is worn off. The same applies to areas on the reverse I have circled. Yes it is true that the hair above the ear will often be flat if the coin is weakly struck. But with weakly struck coins that hair above the ear, while flat, will be the very same color as the rest of the hair and it will have luster. When it does not have luster and is flat and a different color, the cause is wear - not a weak strike. That's the reason for my opinion. edit - sorry, forgot to attach the pics[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
CoinTalk
>
What's it Worth
>
1890 morgan... ??? 63?? bu??? au??
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...