Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
1890 IHC: Snow-1 Quadrupled die!
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="KurtS, post: 2089864, member: 11786"]I just acquired this <a href="http://indianvarieties.com/cents/1890-indian-head-penny/1890-qdo-001/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://indianvarieties.com/cents/1890-indian-head-penny/1890-qdo-001/" rel="nofollow">1890 QDO-001</a> (or Snow-1)--a <a href="http://doubleddie.com/203948.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://doubleddie.com/203948.html" rel="nofollow">class VI</a> quadrupled die that I've been after for a long time. This example is mid-grade, but what's more important--it's an earlier die state that retains a lot of interesting detail in the legends.</p><p>The whole coin is an even brown with fairly even wear:</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8643/15986657533_aa1e1934bd_h.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Here's a closer look at the areas which are subjected to intense die deterioration in later grades. First, detail from a Heritage coin that looks to be a much later die state:</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8619/16580581896_c29ac6009e_b.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>This deterioration is largely absent on earlier die states like my coin--detail of rim:</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8609/16605440451_caef8eab0a_z.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Clearly, there is also very little deterioration under the date, which suggests my coin is EDS. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8661/15984605324_798d3b630f_c.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>After comparing several coins of later die states, I noticed that the doubling on the legends is severely affected by die wear. Since legends are subject to a lot of metal flow, the details of the QDO are also worn, having the effect of enlarging the chunky serifs. No doubt, a lot of the subtle details are lost on later die states. So should later die states be priced less? I think so.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now for <b>the best part</b>: the markers of this quadrupled die. It took some very careful lighting to capture the doubling on the legends.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8622/16605755522_69272a6dfb_b.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8613/16580399056_4159c31fc4_b.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8607/16605756412_1a3276957d_b.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8598/15984201694_fe6977efa7_b.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8673/16607370435_d6cd309e1c_o.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8578/16420546869_7b332167f8_b.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8650/15984202534_0a6cfd9122_b.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>One last detail: the date has something in the “0”. There is discussion this might be a 0/0, and I think that’s a strong possibility. Using an overlay of the 0 punched south, it appears to be a plausible explanation.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8636/16419363870_8a609d8297_b.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="KurtS, post: 2089864, member: 11786"]I just acquired this [URL='http://indianvarieties.com/cents/1890-indian-head-penny/1890-qdo-001/']1890 QDO-001[/URL] (or Snow-1)--a [URL='http://doubleddie.com/203948.html']class VI[/URL] quadrupled die that I've been after for a long time. This example is mid-grade, but what's more important--it's an earlier die state that retains a lot of interesting detail in the legends. The whole coin is an even brown with fairly even wear: [IMG]https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8643/15986657533_aa1e1934bd_h.jpg[/IMG] Here's a closer look at the areas which are subjected to intense die deterioration in later grades. First, detail from a Heritage coin that looks to be a much later die state: [IMG]https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8619/16580581896_c29ac6009e_b.jpg[/IMG] This deterioration is largely absent on earlier die states like my coin--detail of rim: [IMG]https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8609/16605440451_caef8eab0a_z.jpg[/IMG] Clearly, there is also very little deterioration under the date, which suggests my coin is EDS. :) [IMG]https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8661/15984605324_798d3b630f_c.jpg[/IMG] After comparing several coins of later die states, I noticed that the doubling on the legends is severely affected by die wear. Since legends are subject to a lot of metal flow, the details of the QDO are also worn, having the effect of enlarging the chunky serifs. No doubt, a lot of the subtle details are lost on later die states. So should later die states be priced less? I think so. Now for [B]the best part[/B]: the markers of this quadrupled die. It took some very careful lighting to capture the doubling on the legends. [IMG]https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8622/16605755522_69272a6dfb_b.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8613/16580399056_4159c31fc4_b.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8607/16605756412_1a3276957d_b.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8598/15984201694_fe6977efa7_b.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8673/16607370435_d6cd309e1c_o.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8578/16420546869_7b332167f8_b.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8650/15984202534_0a6cfd9122_b.jpg[/IMG] One last detail: the date has something in the “0”. There is discussion this might be a 0/0, and I think that’s a strong possibility. Using an overlay of the 0 punched south, it appears to be a plausible explanation. [IMG]https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8636/16419363870_8a609d8297_b.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
1890 IHC: Snow-1 Quadrupled die!
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...