Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;BUncirculated, post: 1338105, member: 29581&quot;]I&#039;ll go one step further in, first I agree with Doug on the re-grade. But in looking closer at the 88, we know it is definitely NOT a MS67, IMHO it would come back in the lowest MS scale of grade, if not an AU label, because of the hits all over the obverse and the reverse is not all that terrific either. </p><p><br /></p><p>It&#039;s a common Morgan, 19,138,000 struck at Philadelphia that year, and unless it&#039;s a rare VAM, which I don&#039;t see from these pics, it would not be a cost effective idea to resubmit it to a more reputable TPG.</p><p><br /></p><p>The 79-S, now that&#039;s a keeper and does look like NGC hit the mark on that grade. </p><p><br /></p><p>The 21-D, I don&#039;t agree with ANACS&#039; grade on that. Looks like it should be more highend AU, but not MS.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in