1885-O Morgan

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by the_man12, Jul 3, 2009.

  1. the_man12

    the_man12 Amateur Photographer

    I personally doubt it is going to be good enough to submit. It looks like a 63 to me. I would be fine with that because that's still a decent deal for me. Now if there aren't many marks, then maybe it's a 64 but still not worth submitting. I paid $25 free shipping in case anybody was wondering.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. coinman0456

    coinman0456 Coin Collector

    I'm a bit "stingy" anyways. But what if it didn't come back in a 65 holder, now you just increased your cost factor, by how much? and you still are left with a 63/64 coin valued @ $65.OO/$75.OO. But you are spending your money, so it's your right to do as you think. I'm anxious to see better photos, I think at this point , we all are.
     
  4. coinman0456

    coinman0456 Coin Collector

    Thats a great deal MAN on a very nice coin!
     
  5. tmoneyeagles

    tmoneyeagles Indian Buffalo Gatherer

    Well not worth submitting IMO, but $25 was a good deal ;)
    Maybe you can throw it in, if you join PCGS on a higher level like Gold or Platinum, because you get free submissions, 4 for gold level, and 8 if you join at platinum level. So lets say you have 3 coins, you want to send in, out of 4 submissions, and your vouchers are just about to run out, well you can always throw this coin in the order if you want.
    Just a thought.
     
  6. coinman0456

    coinman0456 Coin Collector

    Now thats making a good deal work better for you!
     
  7. tmoneyeagles

    tmoneyeagles Indian Buffalo Gatherer

    Coinman, I wasn't talking about this coin specifically, when I wrote my post, I didn't think, that this coin was a 65, that was not my point.
    My point was if you can pay 63/64 money, plus fees, and GET A 65 coin, that grades 65, not buy a 63/64 coin, that is a 64 and get it in a 65 slab
     
  8. coinman0456

    coinman0456 Coin Collector

    Ok I kinda get the gist of what your saying now. In this case, if there was a really good shot at a 65, given what MAn paid for the coin, certainly it's worth a shot, at worst it's a break even scenario if it returns 63/64
     
  9. tmoneyeagles

    tmoneyeagles Indian Buffalo Gatherer

    Yes indeed, spending $75 for a 63 would drive me coo coo for coco puffs.
     
  10. coinman0456

    coinman0456 Coin Collector

    Given what he paid for it, the most lucrative scenario I think, would be as you stated with the free submission. Now That makes absolute sense to me, and say three hail mary's and 20 "our fathers" it comes back a 65. hehe
     
  11. the_man12

    the_man12 Amateur Photographer

    I like how clean the fields are though no matter the technical grade.
     
  12. coinman0456

    coinman0456 Coin Collector

    yes. As I stated, it's a very nice coin. A keeper for me.
     
  13. the_man12

    the_man12 Amateur Photographer

    I received it today. Here are my pictures of it:


    [​IMG]

    Grade opinions appreciated!
     
  14. tmoneyeagles

    tmoneyeagles Indian Buffalo Gatherer

    Your pics make the marks look better, but I think I want to stick with the MS63 grade, and of course... Nice strike and great coin
     
  15. raider34

    raider34 Active Member

    These pics are much better than the ebay pics, I would say it's a strong 63, maybe even a 64, nice morgan!
     
  16. coinman0456

    coinman0456 Coin Collector


    yup, thats what I said earlier in the post.
     
  17. the_man12

    the_man12 Amateur Photographer

    I've been trying out some different lighting techniques so I don't have to use gimp except for cropping. What do you guys think of this one?

    [​IMG]
     
  18. tmoneyeagles

    tmoneyeagles Indian Buffalo Gatherer


    It gives it a tone that isn't there.
    Would trick many people...
     
  19. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    Don't like that last set of pictures - coin still looks frosty, but not what I think it should be.
     
  20. the_man12

    the_man12 Amateur Photographer

    You mean the golden luster on the obverse? I agree it looked a bit strange when I fist looked at it. I think I could retake that one with a little more light from the fluorescent and less from the lamp. How about this?
     

    Attached Files:

  21. tmoneyeagles

    tmoneyeagles Indian Buffalo Gatherer

    Well the toning just isn't there, from the original set of photos that can be seen.
    The original set of photos that you took are the best so far ;)
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page