Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;messydesk, post: 4098511, member: 1765&quot;]It looks like VAM 27 is a reasonable attribution for this.&nbsp; There is too much wear to be able to see anything other than the date position and mint mark style.&nbsp; A few things to notice and learn from:</p><p>1.&nbsp; The mint mark position doesn&#039;t match the picture shown on VW.</p><p>2.&nbsp; Pictures not supplied by Leroy Van Allen are not necessarily correct, although the mint mark position on the coin shown is still in the normal position.</p><p>3.&nbsp; The specification not specifying a mint mark position implies it is in the normal position, which you can see defined on VW&#039;s &quot;Attribution 101&quot; page.</p><p>4.&nbsp; This VAM states that multiple die pairs may exist, which happens where there is a somewhat generic description such as that for VAM 27, but several dies may fit that description.</p><p>5.&nbsp; You need to look at pcgs.com/photograde and brush up on grading Morgan dollars. This coin has the details of a F15, not XF40.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in