1884-CC

Thoughts on the grade? Thanks

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

I would normally say MS 65+ but that nick on the neck is really noticeable. I would say MS 63 because of the nick, and it might not even grade because of that. Otherwise, it is a beautiful coin.

 

STOP already. Be a productive forum member instead.

 

Here's a cropped extreme close up of the area--is it serious enough to be no grade--damaged? That is the question.

 

Are you speaking to me?

 

No not at all. I was talking about the OP.

 

Everything is SSDD.

 

Oh, okay. Sorry. Looks like a really nice coin that was damaged while in storage in the bag. Shame, because, otherwise it would grade high.

 

Will he know the difference?

Inquiring minds want to know.

 

It's in a GSA holder so I think it gets a 65.

 

No. He probably read the first comment and then has not come back since.

 

This is one time I don't get it , the op asked for a grade and that's what you gave him with an explanation of why . I'd of gone 65 without that hit too , but unfortunately most Morgans come with hits and I'd lower it to a 64 .

 

No reason for him to change until people stop responding

 

GSA MS65

 

Frank , I don't think that's part of the design , looks to me to be more a hit where the little indent usually is . Though my eyes are quite bad , but it looks too big compared to the indent of the design , IMHO . I unless the light is making it look larger than it is .

 

Can he read upside down?

 

Dang , the more I look at it , it looks like the original design as it would be sharper if it were a hit . Nice coin either way .

 

look at the book above