Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;physics-fan3.14, post: 26306388, member: 19165&quot;]I absolutely 100% do not like the Morgan. It is a good fake if you look at it from a distance... but something feels off. My feelings were confirmed with your closeup of the mintmark. Look at the texture of the devices - instead of being smooth, they are very rough. And look at the pattern on Liberty&#039;s cheek. The cheek almost has the &quot;snakeskin&quot; effect that proofs from about 20 years ago had, when laser etching first was used. I have a couple of ideas of how this was created, but neither of them are good.</p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;d wait for more opinions, but if you can get a refund on the Morgan I&#039;d start thinking about that option immediately.... that is a fake for sure.</p><p><br /></p><p>Also... for the price... you&#039;d need to be sure that was about an MS-66 certified... the price you paid raw is... high. </p><p><br /></p><p>The wheat cent... nothing immediately jumps out at me, but your pictures aren&#039;t great. Can you take some more pictures of that one? NGC says the most common fake is an added mintmark on this one... a closeup of the date/MM area might help us.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in