Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Marshall, post: 2579402, member: 21705&quot;]In rereading my earlier post, I did err in calling crack a die variety rather than a marker identifying a die. Also, my desire to trace the die stages(?) across pairings (which would not change the common terminology of new Die Varieties (which is the Pairing of a uniquely identifiable Obverse with a uniquely identifiable Reverse with uniquely identifiable edges being considered subvarieties).</p><p><br /></p><p>The change I propose is carrying the die stage(?) information across varieties rather than starting over with each new Variety. This would be especially useful when dies are changed and then changed back causing an interruption in the die stage(?) progression.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in