Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
1883 Shield 5 Cent
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Marshall, post: 2578335, member: 21705"]No. Each die is a variety which then passes though die States/Stages which are often identifiable. But the die variety is tied to the die, not the stage or state.</p><p><br /></p><p>With a ballpark idea of total number of varieties, you might use 1.01/A.01 so there is no confusion about the die state. There are seldom more than ten die states which usually only changes with a significant change in the die like a crack developing or advancing to a new position or developing a cud. Wear might be used to deterimine if it's a early or late stage of the die state. Here I do differentiate the terms. I hadn't considered it when I chose to call them interchangible.</p><p><br /></p><p>You might identify a die variety which initially can only be identified by the position of the date. Then it might develop a light crack and becomes a second stage/state of that die. Commonly called 1(I) and 1(II) and then progressing until the terminal state of the die. But it's always die variety 1. The use of roman numerals was used by Breen and was tied to the variety die states rather than each die's (obverse and reverse), but I think it should be tied to the die itself whether used on a single variety or multiple varieties.</p><p><br /></p><p>Anyway, if we began using the year followed by the die, numbers for obverse and letters for reverse like Sheldon, and identifying the die state/stage with a decimal followed by the state/stage you would get something like 1793 1.1/A.1. This leaves a second decimal position for newly discovered die states. Say a new discovery between 1.1 and 1.2 is discovered. Simply place it as 1.15 and you don't have to worry about changing the entire sequence. For series where there might be hundreds of dies like the Shield Nickels, you would probably want to modify the reverse lettering a bit and go to AA then AB rather than AA then BB and so forth as Sheldon did after going through the alphabet with the first 26 reverse dies.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Marshall, post: 2578335, member: 21705"]No. Each die is a variety which then passes though die States/Stages which are often identifiable. But the die variety is tied to the die, not the stage or state. With a ballpark idea of total number of varieties, you might use 1.01/A.01 so there is no confusion about the die state. There are seldom more than ten die states which usually only changes with a significant change in the die like a crack developing or advancing to a new position or developing a cud. Wear might be used to deterimine if it's a early or late stage of the die state. Here I do differentiate the terms. I hadn't considered it when I chose to call them interchangible. You might identify a die variety which initially can only be identified by the position of the date. Then it might develop a light crack and becomes a second stage/state of that die. Commonly called 1(I) and 1(II) and then progressing until the terminal state of the die. But it's always die variety 1. The use of roman numerals was used by Breen and was tied to the variety die states rather than each die's (obverse and reverse), but I think it should be tied to the die itself whether used on a single variety or multiple varieties. Anyway, if we began using the year followed by the die, numbers for obverse and letters for reverse like Sheldon, and identifying the die state/stage with a decimal followed by the state/stage you would get something like 1793 1.1/A.1. This leaves a second decimal position for newly discovered die states. Say a new discovery between 1.1 and 1.2 is discovered. Simply place it as 1.15 and you don't have to worry about changing the entire sequence. For series where there might be hundreds of dies like the Shield Nickels, you would probably want to modify the reverse lettering a bit and go to AA then AB rather than AA then BB and so forth as Sheldon did after going through the alphabet with the first 26 reverse dies.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
1883 Shield 5 Cent
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...