Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 420178, member: 15309&quot;]GD,</p><p><br /></p><p>If you can&#039;t consider the possibility that what you are seeing in a crappy photo is toning rather than wear, when nobody else sees wear on this coin, including the 4 members of PCGS, then I can&#039;t help you.&nbsp; I also could not help you see why my MS68 was not infact an MS66 as you concluded, even with a very informative thread that won TOTW.</p><p><br /></p><p>PCGS &amp; NGC do make mistakes, no doubt.&nbsp; However, I feel confident that the graders at NGC are able to determine the difference between a weak strike Morgan and an AU Morgan.&nbsp; I can count the number of coins on one hand that I have seen over/undergrade by 3 or more points by either of these services.&nbsp; You have pointed out 2 severely overgraded NGC coins in one week.&nbsp; I don&#039;t think that is coincidental.</p><p><br /></p><p>I will agree with your contradiction of an NGC/PCGS assigned grade only when you can point to specific and definitive reasons why their grade is wrong.&nbsp; In this case, what you are calling wear, could very easily be toning that looks like wear in a terrible photo.&nbsp; Furthermore, if you really think that you can accurately grade a coin from a photo as well as the professional graders who have the coin in hand, then you my friend are the one who will be making the big mistake.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in