Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;physics-fan3.14, post: 2761334, member: 19165&quot;]Long story short: Return that baby immediately! </p><p><br /></p><p>Strike: 64+ (that is a decent strike. The common assumption is &quot;O Mint strikes are bad&quot;... but that really is more true for the late 80&#039;s, 90&#039;s and later. The early &#039;80&#039;s aren&#039;t as bad). </p><p><br /></p><p>Luster: 64 (luster appears full... with one exception described below)</p><p><br /></p><p>Eye Appeal: 63 ( The coin has been dipped. The toning seen here is secondary after a dip. That isn&#039;t great. )</p><p><br /></p><p>Contact marks: 63 (there are a *lot* of marks on this coin. The fine marks scattered across the fields kill the grade). </p><p><br /></p><p>All of this would add up to a 63. It would be an okay coin, but.... </p><p><br /></p><p>The patch of hairlines in the obverse field, in front of Liberty&#039;s eye. This coin has been wiped/cleaned, and will *not* receive a problem free grade. The dip impairs the luster, and the polishing/hairlines impede it even more. The coin will receive the details grade: UNC Details, Cleaned. Return this one at your earliest convenience. It is a problem coin.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in