Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Paddy54, post: 2765959, member: 19250&quot;]Again [USER=85472]@Dough[/USER] &quot;the OP&quot; yes this is only one of the examples I was referring&nbsp; to in the CPG another ,and I will state edition&nbsp; and volume&nbsp; and &quot;not post copy&nbsp; right material&quot;&nbsp; CPG&nbsp; 4th edition ,volume&nbsp; ll page 2 1829,9 over 3 H-10.</p><p>Is a listing that is completely&nbsp; in error. In fact was listed in a newer edition And noted in future&nbsp; editions&nbsp; would be completely&nbsp; deleted&nbsp; from the text do to space limitations. And the fact it was in error and not a variety&nbsp; as stated. </p><p>Another&nbsp; prime example&nbsp; is on the front cover of the fifth edition&nbsp; volume&nbsp; l . It shows an image of an 1847 large cent 47/4 small 7.</p><p>This variety&nbsp; isn&#039;t&nbsp; even listed in the book at all! Yet it is one of the major varieties&nbsp; in the U.S. Large cent varieties .</p><p>Again Dough I reiterate&nbsp; always follow up when researching&nbsp; variety&nbsp; coins. This is something&nbsp; that&nbsp; I&nbsp; always do. First I love doing the research something in my youth&nbsp; I hated doing.</p><p>And second&nbsp; after&nbsp; 50 plus years&nbsp; of collecting&nbsp; place little&nbsp; trust&nbsp; in opinions&nbsp; of some &quot;so called experts &quot; whom do or say whatever&nbsp; it takes to cover their human mistakes&nbsp; other than say &quot; oh&nbsp; I was wrong&quot;![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in