Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Sean5150, post: 2264026, member: 75607&quot;]You guys are starting to worry me. Here is a pic of the coin from my listing:[ATTACH=full]449793[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Here is a pic of a coin he sold previously that turned out to be the coin I received:[ATTACH=full]449794[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Here is a pic of one of my DMPL coins:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]449816[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Lastly, this is the coin I received taken with my iPhone. It actually looks BETTER than the seller&#039;s photo (well, at least the luster).</p><p>[ATTACH=full]449801[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>I will argue that the seller DID NOT doctor the first photo. Why would someone take a photo that bad to doctor it? You can see his camera and ring in the GSA case, same as the next photo. The only difference is you can see the reflection of the camera in the coin of the first photo. Notice how nothing gets reflected in the coin in the second photo. I can also photograph a coin to make it look not DMPL, like in the third photo. But if you had it in hand you&#039;d be able to shave with it.</p><p><br /></p><p>I really can&#039;t believe people don&#039;t see the prooflike qualities of the first coin. If you look at the other photos in the listing, it will become very apparent.</p><p><br /></p><p>What the seller did (and admitted to) is use the SAME photos for three different listings. Doctoring the photos is really secondary to using different photos altogether.</p><p><br /></p><p>Either way, this matter has been resolved and I am quite happy with the coin I received.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in