Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;mikem2000, post: 1663448, member: 30574&quot;]I really hate to be the downer in this group, but I am fairly certain the coin is not legit, it could possibly be an added mintmark.</p><p>I took the OP pic and blew it up 4x.&nbsp; The pics are blurry so there is a chance I am wrong, but when I blew it up I noticed the second C in the MM was a bit higher than the first.&nbsp; In addition the first one looked a bit too narrow in the open space of the C</p><p><br /></p><p>There are only a total of 6 VAM&#039;s for the 81 CC and out of the 6 there is only 3 reverses used.&nbsp; None of the MM&#039;s on the reverse&#039;s seemed to match</p><p><br /></p><p>Here is the pic.</p><p><br /></p><p>I drew two lines, one across the top of the CC and one across the bottom.&nbsp; Notice where they cross the two L&#039;s since one of the C&#039;s is noticeably higher</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH]245971.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Now here is a picture of a known VAM 6 which has a Reverse 3Cb. They really aren&#039;t even close.&nbsp; This of course is just one of the 3 reverses, but I looked at the other two and they are equally not similar.&nbsp; As I said in the beginning, the blurry pic MAY be making the analysis less than accurate, but I don&#039;t think so, you can be the judge.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH]245972.vB[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in