Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Leadfoot, post: 1540669, member: 2972&quot;]The point is you took the discussion off on a tangent suggesting a coin grading 60-62 should have &quot;no wear&quot;.&nbsp; Specifically, you said &quot;The criteria for a coin to make a BU grade, which is MS60 - 62 it can have no traces of wear.&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>I disagreed within the context of this discussion -- a thread that&#039;s about how TPGs grade coins, and noting your response was to someone who was talking about TPG grades.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Your response to that was to go on a tangent related to ANA grading, followed by a reference to the Redbook -- neither of which are germane to this discussion.</p><p><br /></p><p>If you cannot acknowledge that point I don&#039;t know what to say, and I will give you the break you ask for.</p><p><br /></p><p>Take care...Mike</p><p><br /></p><p>p.s. As for your follow-on post... PCGS does not follow their written standards, in practice, and with respect to this topic.&nbsp; Again, they seem to distinguish the difference between AU and MS mostly around field wear (e.g. luster impairment in the fields) and not high point wear.&nbsp; Said a bit more directly, be careful from confusing their words and their actions.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in