Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;eddiespin, post: 218656, member: 4920&quot;]My honest opinion for what it&#039;s worth is that the face and neck can go as contact marks but I&#039;m not sure what to make of the more indistinct, &quot;flat&quot; fields, especially left field obverse. That&#039;s where, while I usually don&#039;t mind seeing a few contact marks, I do like to see those microscopic mint lines that take my breath away. But instead, I see mostly an indistinct, &quot;flat&quot; appearance. The problem for me is that that appearance, to one degree or another, is all over the coin. As such, I&#039;m inclined to give it the benefit of the doubt, and say it&#039;s storage or mint originated. That makes me grade this MS-63/64. Look at the infield reverse--it looks the same (indistinct, &quot;flat&quot;) as the outfield reverse. That&#039;s why I hesitate to let that be a distracting factor. BTW, nice work, I like it! :thumb:[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in