Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
CoinTalk
>
What's it Worth
>
1876 CC 20 cent peice value
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="BooksB4Coins, post: 1958546, member: 36230"]<font size="4">This is what I mean: instead of taking a few moments to familiarize yourself with the type/date/mint in question, you're trying to weasel in a way that could allow the OP to hold out hope for something that isn't going to happen. Do you really think there is even a remote chance that at least three solid identifiers were somehow distorted, including magically correcting/removing obvious doubling?</font></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><font size="4">I have not once said that "SEGS is crap", so please do not put words into my mouth. What I have said, and on numerous occasions, is that SEGS is QUESTIONABLE while openly admitting that I very much like their holder, and have even had a <i>few</i> good experiences with (and getting decent and deserving material out of) them.</font></p><p><font size="4"><br /></font></p><p><font size="4">As for the rest of this, the issue is not "<i>slip[ing] up on one or two</i>" coins, but doing so on many, and doing it repeatedly. If I remember correctly (and if wrong, hopefully someone who <i><u>knows</u></i> will set me straight) SEGS started out as a decent service, but likely caved to the demands of bulk submitters and/or the temptation of unwarranted leniency, but no matter the cause, the fact is that there is simply too much questionable material residing in their holders for your desired points to be taken very seriously. Beyond this, and for the sake of fairness, I don't think that any of us would question your opinion/views as we do if it were not for the obvious ulterior motive hiding behind them. You can't pretend to be one thing in one thread, and in another be someone altogether different and expect no one to notice. You also cannot expect the membership to sit idly by while misinformation, particularly with the potential to do harm to novice collectors, is spread for the sole purpose of putting money into one person's pocket. </font>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="BooksB4Coins, post: 1958546, member: 36230"][SIZE=4]This is what I mean: instead of taking a few moments to familiarize yourself with the type/date/mint in question, you're trying to weasel in a way that could allow the OP to hold out hope for something that isn't going to happen. Do you really think there is even a remote chance that at least three solid identifiers were somehow distorted, including magically correcting/removing obvious doubling?[/SIZE] [SIZE=4]I have not once said that "SEGS is crap", so please do not put words into my mouth. What I have said, and on numerous occasions, is that SEGS is QUESTIONABLE while openly admitting that I very much like their holder, and have even had a [I]few[/I] good experiences with (and getting decent and deserving material out of) them. As for the rest of this, the issue is not "[I]slip[ing] up on one or two[/I]" coins, but doing so on many, and doing it repeatedly. If I remember correctly (and if wrong, hopefully someone who [I][U]knows[/U][/I] will set me straight) SEGS started out as a decent service, but likely caved to the demands of bulk submitters and/or the temptation of unwarranted leniency, but no matter the cause, the fact is that there is simply too much questionable material residing in their holders for your desired points to be taken very seriously. Beyond this, and for the sake of fairness, I don't think that any of us would question your opinion/views as we do if it were not for the obvious ulterior motive hiding behind them. You can't pretend to be one thing in one thread, and in another be someone altogether different and expect no one to notice. You also cannot expect the membership to sit idly by while misinformation, particularly with the potential to do harm to novice collectors, is spread for the sole purpose of putting money into one person's pocket. [/SIZE][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
CoinTalk
>
What's it Worth
>
1876 CC 20 cent peice value
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...