Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;satootoko, post: 47140, member: 669&quot;]Referring to the picture that is in the first post as of the time of entering this post - one side showing the denomination over a line over the date 1798 - it doesn&#039;t match anything in Krause.</p><p><br /></p><p>The design is very similar to that of C#95, a copper 2 kopek with several varieties.&nbsp; The side with the crown surmounting a character and a &quot;1&quot; stands for Emperor Paul I.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>C#95.2, is described - without a picture - as having a <i><b>large &quot;A.M.&quot;</b></i> mintmark below the date (Annensk Mint), had an unspecified 1798 mintage.</p><p><br /></p><p>C#95.3, shown with a <i><b>large &quot;E.M.&quot;</b></i> mintmark (Ekatarinburg Mint) below the date, had a 1798 mintage of 56,528,000.</p><p><br /></p><p>C#95.4, shown with a <i><b>large &quot;K.M.&quot;</b></i> mintmark (Kolyvan Mint) below the date, had an unspecified 1798 mintage.</p><p><br /></p><p>C#95.1 is described - without a picture - as having no mintmark, but 1791 is the <i>only</i> year shown for that an unspecified mintage of that variety.&nbsp; The values listed are $15 VG, $30 F, $60 VF and $120 XF.</p><p><br /></p><p>Soooooo - either one more error by Krause, or a goofed up counterfeit.&nbsp; (My money is on a Krause foulup. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> )[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in