Was hoping to get your opinion and if possible variety on this 1869 Shield Nickel. It's currently at NGC and I did spend the $15 to get the variety added to the label. My Guess
XF45. Repunched date of some sort, but you gotta be careful with shield nickels... TONS of machine doubling for nearly every single year. Edit... well, guess I missed the variety!
All of the photos I am looking at online, the star points to the foot of the E. Perhaps a comparison photo.
Correct Tommy especially variety coins of this series. This is a series that as for variety there are more unknown varieties than those that are cataloged. The dates 1868 and 69 remind me of the 1943 P Jefferson nickel. As it has over 73 known varieties known and always a chance there's a new one to be discovered. I have several references on the series , there's several that are close but no dead ringer from my sources. I do believe from the image provided it is a rpd and perhasp an mpd as well. The specimen in hand would perhasp again give a better clue as to a new find or an known variety. No matter what cool find and nice coin for sure. Thanks for pointing it out to me...I may of missed the post.
It looks like it could be an XF details. I'm not sure if it's the lighting playing tricks with me, but the surfaces don't appear right, it looks almost like light environmental damage. The variety I am not familiar with, but it does appear to be a RPD of some sort.
Well it is an reverse hub lla the star under the "of" left hand star tip is broken and the next point points to the left foot of the F in of. All of the other stars line up to match the correct letters for this hub type. Obverse is A
I think the date is MDD not RPD. Reverse hub type is is IIa (rev of 67), obv is wide date numerals with obv hub type A. there are die cracks that would help to identify the die pair if any reference ever comes out that is that comprehensive, but at this time there isn't. There are a GREAT many varieties for these coins, many more than are listed in references. There should be somewhere around 1000 die pairs for just this date. The number of varieties that NGC identifies for this series is small compared to the known varieties (they only identify 4 1869 rev of 67 varieties and one of thise only identifies the rev type. One of the 4 has a narrow date which yours doesn't, and the other two aren't pictured.) and they have about a 40% identification error rate in the ones they do identify.
[There should be somewhere around 1000 die pairs for just this date.] True as a die striking these new thick platchets only lasted >10,000 strikes then exploded. Another reason why there's so many die cracks and cuds..... plus it was the mints first attemp to strike in Nickel, as before the 5 cent coin was in silver.[/QUOTE]