Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;mark_h, post: 610559, member: 3726&quot;]Can believe I missed IHC post.&nbsp; Also that wiki page does not always work for me - might be because someone is working on it.</p><p><br /></p><p>To the OP, but based off the discussion I read first this coin might very well be a 64 if it looks as lusterous as that 72.&nbsp; That is assuming that 2x2 is not hiding some wear - I think that was part of the problem.&nbsp; Also based off your picture it made what I assume is luster look like something stuck on the coin - not something floating across the surface.&nbsp; Not meaning to cause offense; but please work on your picture taking ability so we can enjoy what looks like a sweet coin. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />&nbsp; Now, they do not have to be todd-like, but just something to help us enjoy the coin. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>PS I think I would list it as 69/69 - just my opinion.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in