1867-1992 DOTTT Canadian Dime

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by frap123, Oct 10, 2015.

  1. frap123

    frap123 Member

    Hi again a few days back I posted a Canadian Nickel with a DOT well this one is FORESURE another one there also is a larger one on the front of the coin to the right of 1992 faded and the very clear one between D and D just below the original DOT
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. AWORDCREATED

    AWORDCREATED Hardly Noticeable

  4. frap123

    frap123 Member

  5. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

  6. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    There are collectors of Canadian coins who search for a DOT on the surface. I believe it is the equivalent to a Die Chip. Here are some examples of attributed DOT finds
    (not my coins)
    dot1.JPG dot2.JPG dot3.JPG
     
  7. jj00

    jj00 Well-Known Member

    Just some info,
    1947 5 cent - dies didn't arrive until 1948 so mint added a maple leaf after the date, some dies were defective leading to a 1/2 maple leaf or a dot.
    1936 25 cent - new dies were made for Edward VIII who abdicated so the dies for George VI were not ready until late 1937, to prevent a shortage of coins the mint used the 1936 dies with the addition of a dot.
    1937 5 cent - dot was added by mint for 'aesthetics', it was removed the following year.
    So those dots were purposely added by the mint or caused by something purposely added (ie - the maple leaf).
    Dots not added by the mint purposely - usually a die chip error
     
    frap123 and paddyman98 like this.
  8. frap123

    frap123 Member

    So is this in regards for the Dime as well posted above
     
  9. jj00

    jj00 Well-Known Member

    Last edited: Oct 11, 2015
    frap123 likes this.
  10. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    Don't guess these were from the mint doing a hardness test on the dies?
     
  11. jj00

    jj00 Well-Known Member

    Good point, guess I should've added 'IMO, likely a ...' ; not the only possibility.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page