Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;mark_h, post: 900663, member: 3726&quot;]Maybe more than that.&nbsp; First I would say more than likely it is - seems like there are a ton of repunched dates for 1866, but this is not one of the dramatic ones.&nbsp; Those you can actually see the numbers offset.&nbsp; Now I am more curious about the second leaf cluster on the right.&nbsp; I see three leaves and dirt where the fourth leave should be. Do you have a cherry pickers guide?&nbsp; Usually there is a small remnant of a fourth leaf.&nbsp; It could be there in the dirt or worn off.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in