Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GDJMSP, post: 1426018, member: 112&quot;]Sometimes it is wise to wait. Take the 1896, 1900, and 1902 micro-O variety Morgans that PCGS decided to slab and attribute, while NGC refused to slab and attribute those coins for years.</p><p><br /></p><p>PCGS later had to admit they screwed up - <a href="http://coincollector.org/archives/002476.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://coincollector.org/archives/002476.html" rel="nofollow">http://coincollector.org/archives/002476.html</a></p><p><a href="http://coincollector.org/archives/002476.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://coincollector.org/archives/002476.html" rel="nofollow"><br /></a></p><p><a href="http://coincollector.org/archives/002476.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://coincollector.org/archives/002476.html" rel="nofollow">I</a> don&#039;t know what the issue is or why NGC refuses to attribute the varieties. According to Conder, and he&#039;s usually right, NGC has attributed and slabbed 14 of the varieties. But perhaps something has changed since that time and NGC no longer agrees with those attributions.</p><p><br /></p><p>What I do know is, sometimes NGC is right and/or has valid reasons when they refuse to slab or attribute certain varieties.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in